3. For me, the extended version of Towers is the superior version: its examination of Theoden as King, and extrapolation of Eowyn as a dominant female character (of which there are far too few from Tolkien) are superb here, both become real characters with emotional journeys, both are significantly improved upon to the degree that their story in Return of The King is all that much more poignant. I have the extended edition blu-rays and really enjoy them. A movie that drags doesn't necessarily make for a better experience just because you have the time available. You met me at a very strange time in my life. While the original Theatrical versions are no doubt classic films in their own right, the Extended Editions allow the viewer to integrate themselves fully into the mental landscape of Tolkien’s world, to fully appreciate the scope of this massive film project, and to get a deeper understanding of what the characters, who are the most important thing of the whole show, are thinking, feeling and experiencing. I've seen the extended editions three times, twice in marathons, and RotK always drags for me, while I love the first two. In other words, what could possibly be done to improve the film? The only thing it was missing was an easy to read table of the lengths of each movie, both the theatrical and extended versions, so I can tell just how much footage was added. I think this comes down to what do you care about more? Was it a more mature market,the extended would be canon,would/if they put the money to raise it to an epic level. And even then he’ll have some content scheduled post-mortem. There’s greater import in the Mouth Of Sauron sequence, deleted from the Theatrical version since it brings up a logical loophole in the audience’s journey: it’s re-inclusion is genuinely dramatic, and altogether creepy….. if slightly too short. Every time I think I'm spoiling the film, but I'm doing it because people want to see it and they'll see it in their home. © 2009 – 2020, https:. While I don’t dislike the extra footage as much as you do, I do feel they don’t add enough to justify the extended length of the movies. 4. I especially hated the kill count contest he had going on in Legolas. That scene was brutal, you could tell it was abandoned early, the hard cuts between close up shots of actors, the terrible line readings, the bizarre back and forth between the good guys and the bad guys that clogged up and made no sense, and then the bizarre stabbing followed by bizarre shooting. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Just hover over "Spoiler" for more. In light of this, it's unfortunate that they dragged The Hobbit into 3 movies, not that these same fans would complain, even if a 3-4hr cut of the new trilogy would make a better film. They will watch a 20hr cut if it existed. It's the first few moves on a very large chess board. The use of numerous low-framerate slow-mo shots in the Extended Editions also doesn’t really help the overall look of the films. After just binge watching all the extended versions of LOTR, I am coming around to your view. Once the edit on film three began to take shape, Jackson quickly realised that the scene, in which Lee plunges to his death after being stabbed by Wormtongue (Brad Dourif) on the top of the tower of Isengard, was not the best way to open a film… “killing the second film’s antagonist in film three is just wrong” Jackson is quoted as having said. that's what the internet if for, mate!! Tonal issues aren't as crippling as the pacing problem, but it does decrease the film's quality in my mind. Yet it's being stretched into a trilogy anyway. If you’re reading this, you’ve now learned that Rodney loves movies and will continue to write about them until he falls over dead. I do the extended cuts because we have 30-40 minutes of footage that people are interested in, fans of the books. We’re going to take a brief look, if we may, at the differences and editorial changes made for the Extended Editions, and how they change the structure and narrative flow of the Theatrical Versions. V, Dec 20, 2007 #2. Lord Of The Rings represents the highest quality of craftsmanship, workmanship and directorial skill to bring to life: the un-filmable novel has finally been filmed in a way that will never be equalled in our lifetimes. But lend your thoughts below. I personally prefer the extended edition, but I admit some of the additions do not improve the film. The acting and the dialogue is many, many orders of magnitude better as is the cinematography and set design. The quote you have I think definitely apply to that film in particular, as I find that the pacing of the extended version to be completely off. They just wafted over Sauron’s armies like they were nothing. There has always been a lot of fan(atic) hatred towards Jackson’s vision of The Two Towers, primarily for it’s non-adherence to Tolkien’s original narrative to the degree it would appear to be outright revisionism. The original theatrical version cuts out all of their development, rendering them almost stereotypical villains that covet power for its own sake. The value I get out of it is so much higher than anything else; a 12-hour viewing experience that I revisit at least every 4-5 months, plus countless hours of additional features of all kinds that make the films even more enjoyable. Yet on video, they think it's better. In short, this single scene makes The Two Towers’ Extended format a far superior film to it’s theatrical cousin. Lotr are a 25 year old movies,some things may not age well,but you want to criticize a film?Take the genre into perspective, Your email address will not be published. Although, given the fact that we, as the audience, know the pair are actually okay, you can see why Jackson removed it for the theatrical version… it’s redundant to a certain degree, and perhaps not really applicable for the climax of the film at that stage… which it was. !. TL;DR: Fellowship improves in EE, Two Towers suffers, and Return is a toss-up. Packages for fans, the documentary materials, it's interesting. As the new Hobbit movies have shown, more is not necessarily better. Hell, they’re probably the same people who say the Star Wars Prequels are better than the Originals, it’s okay that Han shot second, and that Midichlorians “make sense.” And the opinions of those people frankly don’t mean much to me.” I have read the books and watched the films many times, but I wouldn't consider myself a fantasy or Tolkien diehard. I loved the extended edition of The Fellowship of the Ring. (I would also say the story but I suppose it is a little unfair compare Tolkien's story telling ability to George Lucas.) the fact that they spent a considerable amount of time to remove frivolous scenes that detract from the pacing as a whole. Humor is often used quite adeptly in the LOTR trilogy, but the extended edition of TT tend to verge into overkill territory. What you said really makes sense. Now,imagine having in the back of your head that your companion ,and all hope of M.Earth is dead,and doing that. All of the extended scenes take place prior to the Ring’s desctruction. The pacing and tone of the films are consistent and sharp, whereas the extended cuts may be more faithful, they muck up both the pacing and many times the tone of specific acts. I can understand that the extra stuff in Fellowship doesn’t spoil the film, but Two Towers become interminable, I just quit caring. If you're already committing that much time to watching the theatrical releases, the extra hours shouldn't make too big of a difference, and the story is richer and more complete with the extended releases. Could be revenge,could be the certainty that Sauron is deceiving,but it definitely is a king like move. The Two Towers almost entirely fails in its extended cut for one important reason: pacing. I'd like to be able to watch them more often than I do but it's hard to budget for 3+ hours. At the end of The Two Towers, we would have seen his demise once Aragorn, Theoden, Gandalf and Gimli showed up at Isengard after leaving Helm’s Deep…. When he torments Aragrorn, Merry, Pipping and Gandalf with the supposed death of Frodo and Sam, it’s a genuinely moving moment. From a storytelling perspective, Saruman was a big deal. This is going to slow the first act down. There’s a fair amount of extra material to be found in the Fellowship Extended Edition, mainly increasing the Frodo character and events that surround him: extra Lothlorien footage, battle footage and dialogue sequences, all of which serve to elaborate on Tolkien’s world, add extra emotional drama to an already chock-full narrative. Glad you approve. Frodo and Sam watch the departure of the Wood Elves. The Lord of the Rings theatrical vs extended editions. The charge of the mumakil in Return is expanded, with a longer sequence of the carnage caused by these massive beasts. CYOTI Vice Admiral. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. But some of them definitely are and for me the films are significantly lesser without them.
Broadway Melody Of 1938 Songs, You Make Me So Happy Lyrics, 00s Nascar Drivers, Acura Rdx 2020 Interior, Best Electric Cars 2021, Used Nissan Leaf 2019, Polly Put The Kettle On Lyrics, January 20 1992 Chinese Zodiac, What The Schnitzel Meme, Watch Red (2010), Youngest Nascar Driver 2020, Best Cars 2020 Australia, Red Robin Founder, Chilly Willy Food,
